leica m240 vs m262 image quality

Learn how your comment data is processed. This friendly dig on Facebook from Alex Hakimi somewhat sums up how ridiculous all this really is: if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); Anyway, the point is, at one stage, not all that long ago, I was very happy with the M262 and didnt really feel like the M10 could possibly bring any advantages to me. I will stick with my film Leica for now. I did, yes I have an M10-P now. It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. 1) Slimmer - The M10 has a slimmer camera body than the M240, similar to the Leica film cameras such as a Leica M6. but it really did sound like something was missing inside compared to the 240. This is the reason I was so keen not to be without one for a few months so when the M240 didnt initially seem all that different to the M262 I was really pleased!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_12',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); This relief quickly turned to intrigue. I really have found it quite distracting to have an image preview thats different to what Im used to, especially since its both inaccurate and in a way thats unappealing to my tastes. May be different sensor calibration? Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. Seems I do once again. Its funny, the M262 seems to be the Leica camera that people forget. It has been a bit of an adjustment shooting with such a stripped-down camera but Im really learning to love it a lot. (Leica M (Typ 262)), Unknown. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didn't need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience. p.s. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. November 7, 2013 December 8, 2013 Peter . I like to do a lot of still lifeand some close-up and macro work. It is the first position on the menu, and setting WB on a grey card or to a preset is a matter of 3 or 4 clicks.Colors. With some apprehension, I took the memory card out of the camera and put it into the computer. For me, digital cant create that Portra look, or black and whiteand I really really tried to like the digital Ms, I guess thats where I am different I really enjoy the digital cameras, [] my heart. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. I guess that how much I miss the live-view will define how soon, if at all, I start saving my pennies for a swap. Yes!! Has a built-in focus motor Leica M (Typ 262) So its not a financial burden to have it around, and selling it wont yield me that much cash, and I have no desire to sell it anyways since its my favorite M of all time that still serves some legitimate purpose. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. I shouldve read the manual! BTW the battery life of a charge is awesome. Now, that update costs thousands of dollars. Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. Yura, I still use both with other M along. Any help you learned people would be able to give me as to M240 vs M262 and a good lenswould be invaluable and very much appreciated. I got the m262 because it has everything i need and nothing i do not need. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. They take on a garish orange tint that is hard to process in LR. Even though this image set was only intentionally overexposed by a single stop in direct sunlight, the highlights from the image samples taken by the Leica M246 and the Leica M Monochrom were blown and unrecoverable in post processing. That breaks the rules by my measure, unfortunately . as first digital Leica M, I'd take M (typ 262) but if the M (typ240) is cheaper, go ahead. In fact, there was a time when I swore I didnt need anything more. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. Shooting with the Leica M262 in manual ISO takes 3 commands to change and set the ISO. If not, get the 262. Im not sure about the iso dial though, I feel like thats a feature that would really suit me. Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO. Equally, if I dont find anything particularly bad to say, thats got to be a good thing too, but it doesnt really help in the process of finding things to say. One has a brightline window, the other does not. Really useful! Hi everyone. However it is nice to have a brand new camera and if you can manage without Liveview most M262 users seem very happy with it. I used the M240 for over two years before upgrading to the M10 a year and a half ago. I'm looking into both as well and leaning towards the 262 because I have no use for video with this purchase and I love the shutter. Itd be a waste of time when you can go and find other reviews that no doubt do high ISO comparisons with other brands of cameras etc. With its excellent dynamic range, beautiful colors, and compact design, it won a lot of fans, but perhaps not . I use it for mostly personal/travel type shooting, with the occasional casual paid shoot. Learn how your comment data is processed. Shedding some light on the sources of noise, Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2022, Leica adds 12-bit Cinema 4K Raw video output, improved AF features and more to its SL2-S, A closer look at the Leica M11 (photo gallery), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. Source: DxOMark. Unfortunately, my business partner has also vetoed the idea of me selling both M240 and M262 to buy an M10. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. Bringing up the live-view display gave me what appeared to my taste to be a quite unpleasant representation of the world in front of the camera. Well worth seeking out. This is a useful feature for me that I enjoyed using the Fuji system which had a great focus peaking aid. Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. Hes written some good books, too, some with his partner, Frances. The SET and the ISO buttons are much more useful though to be honest, I personally dont even use the stuff in the set menu either. Controls feel well balanced and satisfyingly precise. At which point I bought a stand-in M240 and I discovered the joys of live view on an m-mount Leica. Didnt have the budget to stretch to a Summilux/Summicron/ Summarit. This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. Unfortunately, this isnt something thats fixed by the M10 either though I am definitely looking forward to how much the M10 improves manual ISO control for me. That alone justifies the decision to buy. I posted this as a person of experience. Personally, I tire of the constant whining about Leica prices. I dont need to get excited by them dont get me wrong, theres fun in a camera that provides some sort of novelty initially, but longer-term I just need my cameras to work in a way that suits me. Great article as always! The new Leica M is the most innovative and versatile M-Camera that the modern M-System has ever created. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. Both are great cameras and either would be fine. In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. Find out more about 35mmc here. As I don't need money selling them "cheap", I'm happy to keep them all for what they are, using each one equally. I have preview turned off too and use it like I do my M6. After more than a month of use it is apparent the M 262 Image quality is better than that of the M-240 (which i have used since it became available). Loomis77December 27, 2020 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. In fact, I could almost go as far to say that even this stripped back Leica has too many buttons and options for my needs! To seethedifference between Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 cameras we have put together Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 specs comparison tablebelow. . Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. With the wrong card, the wait before the shutter is again available is bad. Your previous content has been restored. Any chance youre planning to do a write up on that Nokton 50mm f/1.2? (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. My budget is c. 3,000 for the camera and lens. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? Mostly because of the need for a screen that I allude to. My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. I would say a hidden gem at 2/3 of the price for a used M-10. The smaller file size also allows quicker read/write speeds. Hence, I literally could not give a single poop what Para thinks . Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. (Leica M (Typ 262)) CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. Selling the M262, a camera that I purchased for its pure simplicity; and keeping the Z6, a camera that I purchased for its many features (including live view, a hybrid camera with fantastic video capabilities including full frame 4K, compatibility with my Profoto strobes, owning quite a bit of Nikon F-mount glass, auto-focus, etc.)! When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. Your link has been automatically embedded. Great review as always, I look forward to the M10 review I think the slimmer body size alone is a reason to upgrade, feel like a proper M body. Continue with Recommended Cookies. What is the highest ISO you are comfortable with the 240/262?I find the focus peaking on my M10 better than the Sonys Ive used. Clear editor. Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. Intro Sample Images Lenses Specs Performance. Leica M Typ 240. I so rarely hit the menu button on this camera, it practically doesnt need to be there for my purposes, and Id imagine most users find the same. The Leica M262 feels to me like almost everything anyone could or should expect from a digital Leica rangefinder. No. - 35mmc, https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party, Nikon 28ti and 35ti - Mini-Review - By Ahmed Al Shorouqi, 5 frames with the Nikon FM2 & Agfa APX 400 in my Paris - By Martina Rigotti, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. You cannot paste images directly. Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? The Leica M-D Typ 262 was released in 2016 and is already rather difficult to find. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. Heres some photos: Bear in mind, these have been taken with a load of different lenses:if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-leader-3','ezslot_21',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-3-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-leader-2','ezslot_20',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-2-0'); In conclusion, the Leica M262 is a fantastic camera with a great interface with very few issues worth picking holes in. On the M240 the highlight from focus peaking is often not apparent at all. By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Ultimately, if youre looking for all the bells and whistles, you certainly wont find them on this camera. Thanks a lot for all your helpful comments. In case youre confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. The M240 shot..more DR it seems. Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. All of a sudden, the M10 held a lot of appeal. I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. There is no way to see the chosen ISO until the shot is taken and checking it in the image preview dialogue. I am very pleased to be in a forum withso many helpful people. The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . My guess is that many of the Leica purists won't be bothered at all by this decision. Compared to when I shot with any other camera system, my gut feeling is I come away with fewer shotsless spray and pray . I remember initially thinking that the colours coming out of the M10 files seemed thin when compared to those of the M240 and the photos in your review of the M262 have reminded me of that. Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. The fix is to remove the bottom plate and remove the battery, but this is not a solution for when the decisive moment is at hand.Low Light Performance. How important do you think live view will be for you? Indeed, I am an m10 owner who misses my m9. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. When using the M10 in aperture priority mode I dial the EV down to -0.7. It happened with the M8,M9, more recently the M240 and now the M262. Its back to the basics. For system cameras, having a focus motor in the camera's body allows you to use a wide range of lenses, including lenses which do not have their own focus motor. From what I gather, skin tones have better rendering with the M10. Unknown. One of the advantages of live-view is the same as one of the advantages of rangefinder cameras they both allow you to observe the world outside of the frame. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. A timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). Using the right SD card is key here. Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen's image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. Thanks a lot for your replies. Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. Edit: Since writing this I have been made aware that pressing and holding the ISO button is the quickest way to change ISO. And sometimes they could come in handy. Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount . I think either will be a fine way into a Leica. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Plus it's lighter. I have a X113 and an M262. Image: Leica. In my view the lens in use IS much more important than a bit colour differences M240/M262/other Ms. Just feels like the marketing department have taken over the machine room, unfortunately. Simple. I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. Both should arrived this coming week and so I am getting very excited! I think the sensor is the same, only the signal processing is different because there is no LV. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. Which is the better buy? I had recently bought a Nikon 50mm f/2 LTM lens and had mounted it on the M240. M9 is magic, even SOOC jpgs. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Basically, Im sold on live-view these days but, despite this fact, I didnt think it would appeal to me on a Leica. I need a new 50mm lens. https://www.dailycameranews.com/, ShakeSphere Portable Blender E-Lid review, Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: A Solid but Unremarkable Upgrade. ), and Im now looking to part with the Leica M240 and put the money back into my business (where I borrowed it from). M-D, M-P, M240 and M262 photos. With the M262 even going away for a long weekend I would debate the need to even take the charger for a single battery. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. One review even suggested that the M10 should be called the M11, with the M240 rightfully being the M10. The renderings are quite good as a whole, and this feature is not contained in the M10 which relegates one to only the lens filter option.Card Writing Speed. The camera becomes entirely unresponsive. The controls are easy to change while the camera is at your eye. Press and hold, select ISO, and release to lock in the setting. My M8 is still around for those who are wondering. I wish I did. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In fact, apart from INFO button/screen which reports battery and SD card information, and the play and delete buttons, the ISO button and the menu it brings up is really the only part of the screen-based interface I use. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. I currently shoot with a Fuji X-Pro2 and love it. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. USA Distributor of MCM Equipment leica m240 vs m262 image quality Leica has issued new, updated firmware for the entire range of Leica M10 and M240-generation cameras. The Leica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than the M Typ 240. More battery power can be an indication of longer battery life. Im still getting used to it, but for me a 2 issues, weight with a big 50mm lens and editing the files you really bring out the image quality as it seems a bit flat to me.