You are asked to assess the application or report against a number of criteria. It is particularly important that resources relating to these aspects are explicitly justified in terms of need, scale and nature of resource. The assessment of the expert panel will be shared with you ahead of the prioritisation meeting. Your assessment should be based solely on the resources sought and not on the costs derived from them. Applicants are encouraged to have early discussions with their institutions to identify what training and development opportunities are available to meet their aspirations over the duration of the proposal. support for full economic costs greater than 100,000. for example, EPSRC New Investigator Awards or Fellowships. Press release issued: 11 March 2020. To solve these worldwide issues, the UK becomes the first major economy to pass the net-zero emissions law. take the relative importance of identified impacts into account. This occurs when an organisation cannot be listed as a project partner, for example when the host institution wants to detail a proposed contribution to the cost of the equipment. All these approaches could demonstrate excellence so your judgement should not simply be based on which approach has been adopted. To find the opportunity, search for: NSF Global Centres. epsrc new investigator award example. When undertaking your assessment of the research project, you should consider the unequal impacts of the impact that COVID-19 related disruption might have had on the track record and career development of those individuals included in the proposal, and you should focus on the capability of the applicant and their wider team to deliver the research they are proposing. Information on the portfolio is available through EPSRCs Grants on the Web (GoW). Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter. You should indicate those aspects that you accorded higher or lower priority and why. As such, the focus should be on the stated impact rather than the duration. New Investigator Award: Starts: 01 October 2019: Ends: 30 September 2023: Value (): 280,530: EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: Catalysis & Applied Catalysis: Materials Characterisation: Materials Synthesis & Growth: . There is no set way for answering questions on the form. We expect the level of funding to vary but be appropriate to the proposed research programme. Working within the project team for the EPSRC project "Linking formation mechanisms, nanostructure and function in metal oxide nanosheets using multimodal characterisation" (EP/W026937/1). You can save completed details in Je-S at any time and return to continue your application later. There is no one format to an excellent research programme: the research could directly build on previous work, or it could take a leap forward. In recent years, we have witnessed impressive developments in the mathematical modelling of complex physiological systems. In exceptional circumstances, EPSRC accepts letters of support that do not meet the requirements for project partner letters of support. Research grants are open to UK higher education institutions, research council institutes, UKRI-approved independent research organisations, Public Sector Research Establishments and NHS bodies with research capacity. stream 2 (for established or mature clusters): estimate 3 to 5 awards with maximum 5 million per award, over 4 years; Standard EPSRC eligibility rules apply. Include EPSRC ECR International Collaboration Grant open in the subject line. We recognise that information provided in the full proposal, including the names of the international partners, may differ from the information provided in the intention to submit form. The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . This application is scientifically or technically flawed, This application does not meet one or more of the assessment criteria, This application meets all assessment criteria but with clear weaknesses, This is a good application that meets all assessment criteria but with minor weaknesses, This is a strong application that broadly meets all assessment criteria. I lead the Adaptus Research Group, established to realise adaptive ultrasonics and systems for intelligent medical and industrial technologies. Please note that while the criteria headings mirror EPSRCs standard criteria, additional aspects have been added to the applicant and partnerships and resources and management criteria, and the applicant and partnerships criterion has been made a primary criterion. Found in: Talent UK - 30 minutes ago. For any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000 a two-page equipment business case must also be included in the proposal documentation. The New Investigator Award scheme is intended to support individuals who hold an academic lectureship position, and have not previously led a research group. EPSRC cannot advise on which scheme is likely to be suitable. To undertake research on an EPSRC funded project targeting the integration of electronic and silicon photonic components. You should comment here on the adequacy and appropriateness of this proposed university contribution. is based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. | Learn more about Thomas Kecker's work experience, education, connections & more by visiting their profile on LinkedIn EP/S036490/1). Where applicants wish to include details on flexible working or a career break for reviewers to take into account in their assessment, they are not required to explain the personal circumstances that resulted in the need for this. When undertaking your assessment of the research project, you should assess the project as written, noting that any changes that the project might require in the future, which arise from the COVID-19 pandemic, will be resolved as a post-award issue by UKRI if the project is successful. Please leave enough time for your proposal to pass through your organisations Je-S submission route before this date. It is important that researchers and their research teams are able to work flexibly and in a way that meets their personal circumstances. We encourage you to contact us first to discuss your proposal if you believe your research may cross research council boundaries. Reviewers are requested to comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management making reference to equipment and resources as follows: You should draw attention to any request that in your view has not been justified or, conversely, if something is required but has not been identified. EPSRC New Investigator Award for Dr Meghan Halse. meet the eligibility criteria of EPSRC New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme. The purpose of the New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme is to address a gap that has been identified in the funding landscape and support researchers in their transition to an independent research career. This document is the principal opportunity to explain to reviewers . Graduated with a PhD in Mathematics from UCL in 2014, and a Master's in Physics from the University of Hamburg, Germany. Personal award. Sustainable bio-based materials and manufacture: feasibility study. Thus, how to . This helps reviewers make informed judgements about whether the resources requested are appropriate for the research proposed. Guidance on completing ethical information on the Je-S form. Before starting an application, you will need to log in or create an account in Je-S. Once you have completed your application, make sure you submit document. Our project is a collaborative one between two Universities and a national laboratory working together across a combined theoretical and experimental programme. Dr Meghan Halse has been awarded 210,439 from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) to support research on "Lighting up Magnetic Resonance: SABRE optimisation powered by in situ detection". For visiting researchers, include details of previous visits or collaborations with overseas researchers. If youre applying through the New Investigator Award scheme, you should attach a statement from your host university, typically your head of department describe the universitys commitment to your research career development, and confirm your appointment details and period of probation if relevant. Where the applicants have ticked any boxes confirming that the application involves either animal research or human participation, then you are asked to comment specifically on any ethical considerations and particularly on whether ethical approval procedures have been complied with. Those who are seeking to substantially exceed this should consider other funding mechanisms. Where known impacts have occurred, these should have been highlighted in the application, including the assumptions and information at the point of submission. EPSRC therefore allows applicants to tailor the support that they request in order to facilitate this. NIA provide foundational funds to initiate a research group. Include how the research: Reviewers are requested to comment on the applicants ability to deliver the proposed project, making reference to: Appropriateness of the track record of the applicant(s): Balance of skills of the project team, including collaborators: Applicants are required to identify all resources required to undertake the project, and to clearly justify the request. The panel will then use the information provided in the applications and the responses to the questions raised by the introducers to rank the proposals, using the assessment criteria, at a prioritisation panel meeting. Beyond the immediate use-case of CNNs for automation, there is an opportunity to leverage the internal representations learned by CNNs to perform large-scale data mining and support biological discovery. We do not ask peer review to comment on eligibility. It may be that you feel you can only comment with authority on a specific part or component of an application, for example with a multidisciplinary project, or perhaps where there is a strong user-led element. The NIA scheme aims to support individuals who hold an academic lectureship position (or equivalent) and have not previously led an academic research group or been the recipient of a significant grant. Research quality (excellence) will always be pre-eminent, and no application can be funded without clearly demonstrating this aspect. UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) is committed in ensuring that effective international collaboration in research and innovation takes place with integrity and within strong ethical frameworks. A full justification for your assessment of the application should be provided. 15 Customer reviews. This question requires an answer. Particularly with the increased pressures of COVID-19, EPSRC would like to stress to assessors that any cash or in kind support from the university for a grant is regarded as a benefit to building partnerships but is not expected to equate to cash or its equivalent (for example, provision of studentships, secondments, training and access to equipment). Dr Pierangelo Gobbo said: "Currently, the research field of bottom-up synthetic biology is trying to fill the gap between biology and chemistry to better understand . You may request funding for staff costs, equipment and other items required to carry out the project, costs related to impact, and travel and subsistence. Unless specified in the call or scheme guidance documentation, EPSRC does not require matched funding, either cash or in kind, to secure funding. MCOS (RPS) Postgraduate Scholarship, MCOS (RPS) Sep 2006. Now in its fifth edition, it is intended to provide an overview of research interests, to function as a guide for prospective (as well as current . EPSRC has up to 5,000,000 to spend on the 2 funding routes of this funding opportunity, including: You may apply for up to 200,000 at 100% full economic costs with a duration of up to 2 years. We expect the majority of your research to fall within our remit. This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. You should also comment on any potential adverse consequences for humans, animals or the environment and whether these risks have been addressed satisfactorily in the application. Please provide as full a response as you believe you are qualified to. For more information see host organisation statement for New Investigator Award. If, for any reason, you feel that you are not able to assess the application, please advise EPSRC accordingly. This funding opportunity is only open to early career researchers who meet the eligibility requirements of the EPSRC New Investigator Award scheme. EPSRC will not fund a project if it believes that there are ethical concerns that have been overlooked or not appropriately accounted for. This makes it easier for the panel to assess how complete and convincing the applicants responses are. 2021. As an internationally collaborative grant, particular attention should be paid to standard conditions 2.6.1 and 2.6.2. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter - 964 . Reference MED03699. The justification of resources, taking up to two A4 sides, should explain the necessity of your requested resources to your research project, including implementing the Impact Plan. Specific guidance is available for each section of the report to be completed. Reviewers are requested to comment on the degree of research excellence of the proposal, making reference to three key aspects: Applicants are asked to set their proposal in context, in terms of the current state of knowledge and other work under way in the field. An NIA is not intended to be an alternative to a fellowship, standard mode grant or other similar funding mechanism. This will help applicants build an in-depth knowledge of our peer review processes and principles, helping you to further increase your knowledge of reviewing and proposal writing. Encourage a greater degree of university support to aid career development. Opportunity status: Upcoming Funders: Funding type: Fellowship Publication date: 27 January 2023 Opening date: 10 February 2023 9:00am UK time Closing date: 5 April 2023 4:00pm UK time Last updated: 27 January . Find out more about completing your application. The proposal cover letter should also be used to highlight anything that has been discussed and agreed with EPSRC staff beforehand. Does the proposal specify routine and novel ways to engage end users or partners to help realise impacts? . support for postdoctoral research assistant time, a grant for equipment worth more than 20,000. The experiments ar Note that the existence of competing groups elsewhere should not of itself be seen as a reason for downgrading a proposal. The scheme only supports UK research organisations, with grants ranging from 100,000 to 300,000 full Economic Cost (fEC) can be awarded. The additional information will be requested from you in late March 2023. whether the proposal contains a clear vision, addresses a specific challenge or makes a step change in its field, the progress this programme will deliver beyond current state of the art, the intended outputs of the programme, for example, new ideas, tools, techniques, discoveries, and whether these are ambitious but realistic. Best Paper Award at the Civil Engineering Research in Ireland (CERI) conference August 2022. A proposal that demonstrates excellence can be characterised by terms such as: novel, ambitious, timely, exciting, at the international forefront, adventurous, elegant, or transformative, but it need not demonstrate all of them. Requests for resources should be clearly articulated in the justification of resources section of the grant application. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. https://www.ukri.org/councils/epsrc/guidance-for-applicants/types-of-funding-we-offer/new-investigator-award, Contacts for the New Investigator Award scheme, Browse our areas of investment and support, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). Find out more about our research areas and themes. 954 . The grant value may include the cost of access to facilities (these funds are not awarded to the grant holding organisation). If you have a concern that the application raises ethical issues that have not been clearly identified or addressed, you should raise this directly with EPSRC, which will need to make a policy decision on how the application should be treated. You are asked to comment on the project plan and management arrangements, which should be proportionate to the scale and complexity of the activity proposed. As part of this, any private, personal or commercial interests relating to an application for funding to the research councils must be declared in a covering letter included as an application attachment. Institutions may or may not . The proposal, reviewers comments and your response will then go to a panel that will score it against our assessment criteria and rank it with other new investigator proposals. whether the applicant has demonstrated that the research is timely what would happen if they didnt undertake this research now? The work programme, maximum of one A4 side, should be illustrated with a simple diagrammatic work plan, such as a Programme Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) or Gantt chart. based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. Principal Investigator . Universities may wish to support applicants through allocation of a PhD student. Any investigators who do not have a Je-S account must register for one at least 7 working days before the opportunity deadline. Please select the Lead Agency agreement under which you wish to apply. Where reference has been made to a period of flexible working or a career break, you should recognise that this is likely to affect productivity and career development, for example publication record, track record of securing funding, or the ability to build networks or to take up opportunities in a different geographical location. Reviewers are not required to consider this additional information when providing comments on an application. Also, as Je-S does not support all Microsoft Office Word font types, unsupported fonts will be replaced, possibly resulting in layout changes to the document. EPSRC acknowledges that it is a challenge for applicants to determine the future impacts of COVID-19 while the pandemic continues to evolve. Customer Reviews. Americas. Find out more about the new investigator award expectationsincluding what we are looking for and the support expected from your host organisation. EPSRC does not accept uninvited resubmissions of applications to help reduce the pressure on everyone involved in our peer review process. EPSRC will not support overheads, salary or research activity costs for overseas researchers during times that they are not working in the UK. We will not accept uninvited resubmissions of projects that have been submitted to UKRI or any other funder. For sensitive information the applicant should state clearly whether the information is confidential. Questions can be submitted prior to the event using the EPSRC international team email address or during the webinar using the question and answer function. Apply for funding to initiate or develop new international partnerships with researchers overseas. The application should clearly demonstrate the methodology the applicants intend to use to attain their stated objectives, and you should comment on how clearly these are described, how appropriate they are for the planned activity, and their scientific or technical feasibility. The new investigator award is for people who hold an academic lectureship position at UK higher education institutions, research council institutes, UKRI-approved independent research organisations and NHS bodies, and have not previously led an academic research group or been the recipient of a significant grant. Smaller items of equipment (individually under 10,000) should be in the Directly Incurred Other Costs heading. For example, we often have . Prospective applicants are invited to join a webinar on 16 November 2022 at 10:00am UK time. Find out about the international development funding route. Ed Baines. This funding opportunity has 2 parallel funding routes: This page details the requirements for the open funding route of the funding opportunity. Thoroughly researched, expertly written, and styled accordingly. EPSRC may reject applications that do not meet attachment format requirements. Find out more about eligibility for new investigator awards. Complete the intention to submit form on Smart Survey. As part of the impact assessment, reviewers comment on whether a collaboration is appropriate; therefore, a good project partner letter of support shows that the collaboration is genuine, and explains why the project partner supports the project. Whether they are successful or unsuccessful, applicants who apply for an early career researcher international collaboration grant are still eligible to apply for a New Investigator Award. This includes but is not limited to funding available to cover: Support may be requested for international partners (both investigators and researchers).